From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.4.106 with SMTP id 70mr43397714yhi.33.1415889045169; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:30:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.49.35 with SMTP id p32mr1881qga.38.1415889045133; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:30:45 -0800 (PST) Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u7no1358141qaz.1!news-out.google.com!u1ni10qah.0!nntp.google.com!i13no1358439qae.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:30:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.254.158.52; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.254.158.52 References: <87fvdr2vdv.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam> <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com> <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad> <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com> <084b1934-9641-425e-85ec-293e0334413e@googlegroups.com> <86bf69c8-eb08-4696-b6c9-3784f5c42213@googlegroups.com> <1415776387.7960.41.camel@obry.net> <4b21e212-7744-433a-a939-a82ef63ce8cc@googlegroups.com> <1415791954.7960.59.camel@obry.net> <2c66b776-777b-4530-a1a3-21337cefab85@googlegroups.com> <1ac854d1-36b7-4d06-b673-ad25cdb71736@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <26c926cb-c011-4add-9639-f5c09acf8337@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT? From: Maciej Sobczak Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:30:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:190539 Date: 2014-11-13T06:30:45-08:00 List-Id: > About what? Stalemate has already acknowledged he wants this. He just > couldn't shove it down people's throats far enough at that time. Later on > when Linux finishes blotting out all the other desktop and low-end server OS > and all the other toolchains have disappeared people will have to swallow > whatever the FSF tells them and like it, sir! By "all the other toolchains" you mean also llvm? Because as far as I know, this toolchain is actually starting to push gcc out of the picture (think FreeBSD, Apple). So, don't worry about the world dominance of gcc and possible tricks that might follow. -- Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com