From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:2134 comp.software-eng:1236 news.groups:7792
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!kmcentee
From: kmcentee@Apple.COM (Kevin McEntee)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng,news.groups
Subject: Re: Apology for ``Bill Wolfe''
Message-ID: <26856@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 6 Mar 89 21:31:35 GMT
References: <4655@hubcap.UUCP> <6173@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <6173@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> rjh@cs.purdue.EDU (Bob Hathaway) writes:
>In article <4655@hubcap.UUCP>, 629mtc@hubcap.clemson.edu (Clemson AI Lab,3444,3444,0000) writes:
>>If WOLFE should somehow regain USENET access, please
>>do not reply to its postings.  That only makes it waste more
>>CPU cycles and network bandwidth; it seems unable to terminate
>>any discussion.
>
>Regardless of your opinions on Bill Wolfe, your posting (and a previous
>one to the same effect) are the worst show of lack of professionalism 
>and network ethics on USENET I can recall.  If I were spaf I'd find out 
>who you are and throw you off USENET.  Keep personal conflicts personal.
>By the way, I know spaf and I'm forwarding a copy of this to him as well.


I don't mind, actually I'm quite impressed!