From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_SHORT
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 23 Jan 93 20:21:52 GMT
From: visicom!rlk@nosc.mil  (Bob Kitzberger)
Subject: Re: Why and how do organizations select the OO
Message-ID: <267@visicom.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

bs@alice.att.com (Bjarne Stroustrup) writes:

>mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman @ George Washington University) writes
>
>    They hired a _really_ big-name consultant (NOT a professor, Mark!)
>    to teach them his OO methodology and take a first crack at a design
>    for them. After collecting a very large fee, he walked away from the
>    project, leaving behind what they say is an unworkable design. 
>
>I realize you probably can't name names, but it would be nice if you could
>for two reasons. Firstly because charaltans ought to be exposed, secondly
>because someone could misinterpret your statement into something condemning
>lange groups of ``OO-experts'' as windbags who don't deliver. (there are
>no shortage of windbags and self-proclaimed ``experts,'' but no one field
>has a monopoly on them).

There is a possibility, of course, that the design was indeed 'good', but
the engineers on the project weren't qualified enough (read: OO-educated,
open-minded, etc.) to implement it.

	.Bob.
----------------
Bob Kitzberger          VisiCom Laboratories, Inc.
rlk@visicom.com         10052 Mesa Ridge Court, San Diego CA 92121 USA
                        +1 619 457 2111    FAX +1 619 457 0888