From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5db2a4f776607ef6 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.204.131.75 with SMTP id w11mr207137bks.0.1332284845857; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Path: h15ni30286bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Shark8 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada advocacy Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <26539148.1708.1332284736952.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynv11> References: <19595886.4450.1332248078686.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.230.150.102 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1332284845 12287 127.0.0.1 (20 Mar 2012 23:07:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: anon@anon.org In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.230.150.102; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-03-20T16:05:36-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:42:24 PM UTC-6, an...@att.net wrote: > The main problem is you have forgotten the golden rule the "Customer" or > group that is paying for the program sets the rules. If they say they > prefer non Ada then you should choose a language they like or they will > simply use someone else and you out of a job. This is true; but how many customers actually care about the implementation language/platform? Unless it's extremely specialized (ie micro-controllers) or a windows application [specifically], that is. > Because most will say if Microsoft does not support Ada, then we do not > support Ada. And no matter how many reasons you can give will every change > most people minds. Microsoft *does* support Ada via its .NET platform... unless you want to argue that the "program in your preferred language" bullet-point touting .NET's advantages is false.