From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:3941:: with SMTP id w1mr4948051jae.7.1552478386758;
        Wed, 13 Mar 2019 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f354:: with SMTP id r81mr1460730oih.157.1552478386423;
 Wed, 13 Mar 2019 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r6no1585ita.0!news-out.google.com!l81ni41itl.0!nntp.google.com!82no98496itk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56e6bb4c-fb8a-4ff9-8497-64d8fd5d033b@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.109.61.2;
 posting-account=QF6XPQoAAABce2NyPxxDAaKdAkN6RgAf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.109.61.2
References: <b196da6e-4614-42f9-9147-b1708c6e5094@googlegroups.com>
 <c16f6c7d-34d9-4d7e-96e6-9c00e387b2a9@googlegroups.com>
 <q66m95$8ri$1@dont-email.me>
 <c80fd0e5-b12a-4a5f-a821-71824d76bcbb@googlegroups.com>
 <56e6bb4c-fb8a-4ff9-8497-64d8fd5d033b@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2577a37d-bbf5-46a8-ad4f-d57c8288cdfb@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Intervention needed?
From: Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:59:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55861
Date: 2019-03-13T04:59:46-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 7:08:14 AM UTC-4, Jere wrote:
> 
> > And, surprise, nobody cares. Because now their pointers are safe.
> > 
> > > Other than that, Rust seems to be a typical C-family language with all the 
> > > dangers that implies.
> > 
> > What dangers? Like for example pointers? Oh, wait...
> > 
> > And you still wonder why you are not convincing and cannot attract newcomers to the language.
> > 
> 
> I just think in discussions like this, especially when they cross over into
> other communities, shouldn't devolve into "you're wrong!", which can easily 
> happen since many of us get pretty passionate about Ada.  
Just wanted to clarify, Maciej, that my response here isn't directly to
your quote, but to the email chain as a whole.  Your input just happened to
be the most recent discussion.  I too am worried about attracting new comers.
I wasn't intending to say your comments that I quoted fell into the "you're 
wrong" category at all.  Sorry if I caused confusion.