From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.42.118.75 with SMTP id w11mr48206457icq.5.1415941976336; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:12:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.41.147 with SMTP id z19mr967189qgz.1.1415941976304; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:12:56 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!hl2no1527267igb.0!news-out.google.com!m4ni192qag.1!nntp.google.com!u7no1535358qaz.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:12:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.46.72.234; posting-account=yiWntAoAAAC1KqC_shmxJYv07B9l6LNU NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.46.72.234 References: <87fvdr2vdv.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam> <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com> <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad> <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com> <084b1934-9641-425e-85ec-293e0334413e@googlegroups.com> <86bf69c8-eb08-4696-b6c9-3784f5c42213@googlegroups.com> <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org> <19fa65d4-72c9-44ab-b44b-4ea0929c18f2@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <25731193-c0b5-4ab7-87ff-ba8c6a42cdbd@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT? From: David Botton Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:12:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23259 Date: 2014-11-13T21:12:56-08:00 List-Id: > Semi-related to this is that we approved Obj'Image as a language-defined= =20 > attribute, to be included in the 2015 Ada Corrigendum. Very nice. Do you have a list of which parts of Ada 2005 and 2012 Janus already suppor= ts? I'd like to see what is involved in getting Gnoga running on it (outsid= e that AWS would not compile on it as is, although it may be possible to pe= ar down things to just what is needed which is a very small part of AWS and= port that). If not too big a job, even though I am partial to open source tools obvious= ly, I'd consider doing the port. David Botton