From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.36.66 with SMTP id v42mr10886907yha.10.1414750286951; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:11:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.105.118 with SMTP id b109mr963qgf.31.1414750286892; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u7no1392983qaz.1!news-out.google.com!u5ni19qab.1!nntp.google.com!i13no230369qae.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:11:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.163.1.105; posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.163.1.105 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <25600fdf-9685-4066-87a2-b66085a937bd@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Question regarding example code in AI12-0140 From: Mark Lorenzen Injection-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:11:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22942 Date: 2014-10-31T03:11:26-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:21:04 PM UTC+1, Adam Beneschan wrote: > There are no formal generic types in this example, because you're not def= ining a generic. Perhaps you're confused because (<>) has been used since = Ada 83 in formal generic types to mean "formal generic discrete type"? But= the (<>) syntax was given a new job in Ada 95. Of course - my bad! Thanks for the clarification. Regards, Mark L