From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,eeb3ea7993143012 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr6170287pbc.0.1337178987781; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Path: pr3ni5508pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Adam Beneschan Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Declaring private packages to instantiate generics? Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <25586653.906.1337178987063.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcvy1> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337178987 1098 127.0.0.1 (16 May 2012 14:36:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:36:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-05-16T07:36:27-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:21:24 AM UTC-7, Markus Sch=F6pflin wrote: > I just found myself wanting to write the following code, which Gnat doesn= 't like: >=20 > ---%<--- > package FOO is > procedure P; > end FOO; >=20 > package body FOO is > package BAR is new SOME_GENERIC_PACKAGE; > procedure P is new BAR.P; > end FOO; > --->%--- >=20 > Can I somehow provide the body of P without writing a procedure which jus= t=20 > forwards to an instantiation of BAR.P, IOW without having to write: >=20 > ---%<--- > package body FOO is > package BAR is new SOME_GENERIC_PACKAGE; > procedure BAR_P is new BAR.P; > procedure P is begin BAR_P; end; > end FOO; > --->%--- >=20 > Regards, > Markus You can change the last to procedure P renames BAR_P; But that's the best you can do. If you have an incomplete declaration (i.e= . the declaration of P in the *spec* of FOO), you can't complete it with a = generic instantiation---that's the rule. (I think he reason is that a gene= ric instantiation is equivalent to a declaration of the instance followed b= y the body of the instance, and doing that here would mean you're declaring= P twice, which isn't allowed. It can be argued that the language rules sh= ould be relaxed in this case, since it's tripped up more than one person, a= nd offhand I don't see any complications that would arise if it were allowe= d.) -- Adam