From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,14f7200925acb579
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (Roger Barnett)
Subject: Re: No Go To's Forever!
Date: 2000/03/23
Message-ID: <255373925wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 601763308
X-Mail2News-Path: 
 news.demon.net!finch-post-12.mail.demon.net!natron.demon.co.uk
References: <38D7B41D.B3494C6A@lmco.com> <38D8E9DE.14E93706@quadruscorp.com>
 <8barht$4u6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38D947B9.6C50@synquiry.com>
 <577547997wnr@natron.demon.co.uk> <8bdc3i$tc1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 953907066 mail2news:4095 mail2news
 mail2news.demon.co.uk
Organization: Real Objects Ltd
Reply-To: Roger@natron.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 2000-03-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article: <8bdc3i$tc1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> 
writes:
> 
> In article <577547997wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>,
>   Roger@natron.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > So I guess this is not the group to discuss the goto
> > label_variable construct ?
> 
> 
> Probably not :-)
> Note that most safety critical protocols ban this kind of
> construct for very good reasons.

That must depend on the associated semantics and rules, and
how they are enforced.

-- 
Roger Barnett