From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,813721ce0a7049d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-06 09:24:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: mcq95@earthlink.net (Marc A. Criley) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Are jgnat tools compatible with Java 2? Date: 6 May 2003 09:24:49 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <254c16a.0305060824.39e69f8@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.189.193.138 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1052238290 14993 127.0.0.1 (6 May 2003 16:24:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 May 2003 16:24:50 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37009 Date: 2003-05-06T16:24:50+00:00 List-Id: peterm@resmed.com.au (Peter Milliken) wrote in message news:... > I am just starting to explore jgnat-1.1p(NT) and found the first thing > I attempted failing. I have Sun's j2sdk1.4.0_01 loaded on my computer, > so I attempted the example shown in the jgnat user's guide for > creating Ada package specs from Java .jar files with (Chapter 6): JGNAT 1.1p worked pretty well with j2sdk 1.2; I considered it _almost_ production quality. With 1.3, however, tasking broke, so I expected that all bets would be off for 1.4 and beyond. And your experience, and another's who previously posted here tends to support that conjecture. JGNAT is no longer being supported by ACT, so there's not much to do unless you want to take on the maintenance yourself. Marc A. Criley Quadrus Corporation www.quadruscorp.com