From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a32653cf595422e6
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.205.123.140 with SMTP id gk12mr412274bkc.1.1335128431424;
        Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 h15ni154002bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and register allocation
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <25429130.1239.1335127991071.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlp2>
References: <4f9138c2$0$6628$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4f9145b5$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <jmrpej$cao$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4f918218$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <87ipgtgkho.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <4f94379b$0$6639$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.77.226.39
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335128431 6878 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2012 21:00:31
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <4f94379b$0$6639$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.77.226.39;
 posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-04-22T13:53:10-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le dimanche 22 avril 2012 18:53:46 UTC+2, Georg Bauhaus a =E9crit=A0:

> Still, a pragma controlling inline expansion (not just the enabling
> pramga that Ada has) seems a more pragma-tic way of specifying what
> I'd like, in the shape of a clearly visible request. (The compiler
> may still ignore it).
> Controlling inline expansion by playing with sizes of subprograms
> seems possible, but a little adventurous.
>=20
> Currently, I see only one way, writing a forest of
> options for translating units of re-structured programs...

Did you consider the -gnatn option (rather: not using it...) ?
"-gnatn    Enable pragma Inline (both within and across units)"
(the "within" is relatively new: IIRC -gnatn was controlling only cross-uni=
t inlining some time ago).
_________________________
Gautier's Ada programming
http://gautiersblog.blogspot.com/search/label/Ada
NB: follow the above link for a valid e-mail address