From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:a207:: with SMTP id
 l7-v6mr2345597ioe.134.1530109160913;
        Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:1a18:: with SMTP id a24-v6mr652826oia.5.1530109160628;
 Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!d7-v6no1852217itj.0!news-out.google.com!p13-v6ni2274itf.0!nntp.google.com!u78-v6no1833760itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <06e9a2de-7d05-41ce-a459-c39855d429fd@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=208.114.128.61;
 posting-account=MRPdDAoAAADUJmZVjnYaoafXFMadSeY1
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.114.128.61
References: <584564c2-9f64-4965-b045-535cdaf899c0@googlegroups.com>
 <pgdtbd$7pd$1@dont-email.me>
 <7cb22c58-3009-47f0-8fe7-62f3cd61785d@googlegroups.com>
 <1879145989.551211041.811077.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <06e9a2de-7d05-41ce-a459-c39855d429fd@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <25267926-202c-4ae3-821a-097c1c27697a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Why are Ada compilers difficult to write ?
From: Olivier Henley <olivier.henley@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:19:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53375
Date: 2018-06-27T07:19:20-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Ummmm, apparently you are stuck in 1992 or something.  C++=C2=A0ain't you=
r father's Oldsmobile anymore, to paraphrase the old television commercials=
.  Time marched onward in C++, as shown in the timeline at the URL=C2=A0bel=
ow.  Threads-of-execution, sequence points, thread-local storage, condition=
 variables, multireader-uniwriter locks, threadsafe STL, atomic smart point=
ers, futures, latches &=C2=A0barriers, coroutines, transactional memory, ta=
sk blocks (i.e., rendezvous), plus inheriting C99's and C11's work on multi=
threading and lack-of-aliasing.

Ummmm, apparently you are stuck in 2021 or something. C++ is your father's =
Oldsmobile that was selected for a 'Pimp My Ride' episode.

>From http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html

- transactional memory : No
- task blocks are not even mentioned (N4411)

>From https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

- coroutines : No
- task blocks are not even mentioned (N4411)
what else ... not more time to loose on that.

Do you really want me to check for Visual Studio 15/17 support for the feat=
ures you mentioned?