From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 12 Aug 93 02:45:23 GMT
From: munnari.oz.au!sol.deakin.OZ.AU!usenet@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: forth/fifth generation languages?
Message-ID: <24caub$2et@sol.deakin.OZ.AU>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In Article <24b6v7$lo6@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>
krc@wam.umd.edu (Kevin R. Coombes) writes:
>>I think, a language is not made more complex by adding a feature. 
>>
>
>And so, by induction, a language is not made more complex by adding
>arbitrarily many features ? Even infinitely many ?

Correct (note that the word "necessarily" is implied by the context of the
original quote).

In a similar way, a telepone book is not made more complex by the addition
of arbitrarily many entries, merely larger.