From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7251fa99aab97e06
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-26 14:58:30 PST
Path: 
 sparky!uunet!UB.com!pacbell.com!network.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!ucbvax!STARS.RESTON.PARAMAX.COM!munck
From: munck@STARS.RESTON.PARAMAX.COM (Bob Munck)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ichibah flames, and flames out over, Ada 9X
Message-ID: <24634.730767510@blackbird>
Date: 26 Feb 93 22:58:30 GMT
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: munck@STARS.Reston.Paramax.COM
Organization: The Internet
Date: 1993-02-26T22:58:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In Volume 93 : Issue 89,
eachus@mitre-bedford.arpa (Robert I. Eachus) says:

> ... Jean send a message to the list saying it was now time to
> consider the style issues and "with null" was first on the
> list.  ... several people including Jean felt that the
> keyword should be class, not tagged, and should precede
> not follow the "type XXX is." 

Jeez.  It sounds like you guys are arguing over how many angels
can dance on a pin and Jean left in a huff because you decided
it was an odd number.  I mean, this is an ISSUE??!?

It seems to me that Ada is, right now, going through a serious
crisis at the level of pure survival.  Maybe there's a better
focus for all this energy and passion?

Bob Munck