From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.82.115 with SMTP id n79mr4185120yhe.35.1384533002989; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:30:02 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.82.9 with SMTP id e9mr58294qey.13.1384533002960; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:30:02 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.stack.nl!news.litech.org!news.glorb.com!i2no2251027qav.0!news-out.google.com!9ni28650qaf.0!nntp.google.com!i2no2251018qav.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:30:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.251.73.50; posting-account=O3LyFwoAAACc1uh60ZcOUmAGdDmGsEcV NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.251.73.50 References: <720ff309-dce6-4de7-a07e-8e20ec8fe228@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <23f190f8-038f-42e1-acd7-a0af6e9aa59b@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Has anyone here used libAgar? From: slos Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:30:02 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17683 Date: 2013-11-15T08:30:02-08:00 List-Id: Le jeudi 14 novembre 2013 13:53:35 UTC+1, Marius Amado-Alves a =E9crit=A0: > I plan to look at Agar, but no precise schedule yet. I and Vargas plan to= bind SDL. Again, no precise schedule. We have a couple things up on source= forge and bitbucket. Anyone welcome, as critical mass needed. Just shoot us= an email. >=20 >=20 >=20 > State of SDL binding is as follows. Vargas's binding works, but is for SD= L 1. SDL is now at 2. The SDL files from Libre AdaCore look empty. All bind= ings are thin yet. I plan to automate the thin binding process using dumpad= aspec(?) tool of GCC. Well, it may look empty but it works it seems : http://university.adacore.com/courses/lessons/a-bouncing-ball/