From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3e341f7795ed8bda X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.138.146 with SMTP id a18mr1303087qau.6.1343312661795; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.85.162 with SMTP id i2mr1772700paz.30.1343312556704; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Path: a15ni105485768qag.0!nntp.google.com!q21no13462345qas.0!news-out.google.com!p10ni61947386pbh.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Adam Beneschan Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: pragma Convention() Ada2012 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 17:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <23d960aa-3f5b-4710-aa9e-bbb1782bc54c@googlegroups.com> References: <1olyz5p5952ya.i7joo9fs065h.dlg@40tude.net> <87vchgu8w7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.4.246.214 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343005003 5780 127.0.0.1 (23 Jul 2012 00:56:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:56:43 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.4.246.214; posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Received-Bytes: 2517 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-07-22T17:56:43-07:00 List-Id: On Saturday, July 21, 2012 10:17:24 PM UTC-7, Shark8 wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2012 3:00:40 PM UTC-6, Florian Weimer wrote: > >=20 > > I don't think this is possible in general because the entity has > > usually been frozen at that point. >=20 > I think you're right; the Specification file *must* be able to provide th= e > correct information on generating subprogram-calls, which is impacted by > conventions, but I know you can put the convention-pragmas in the private > section. Yes, usually. I think Florian is confused. I'm not sure what he was think= ing about, but the "private" keyword that separates the private part of a s= pecification from the visible part doesn't freeze anything, as far as I kno= w. When the *end* of the specification is reached, then many things that w= eren't frozen before become frozen, but the private part comes before that.= So most Convention pragmas in the private part are OK. -- Adam