From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!tle.enet.dec.com!brett
From: brett@tle.enet.dec.com (Bevin Brett)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Use pragma INLINE or not?
Message-ID: <23701@shlump.lkg.dec.com>
Date: 20 Jun 91 13:07:48 GMT
Sender: newsdaemon@shlump.lkg.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


... 
>>There seem to be 2 schools of thought:
...

Pragma INLINE gives a compiler permission to establish a dependency on
a library level compilation unit BODY in order to do the inlining.  This
permission is not granted without the pragma.

So the advice is.  Don't both if the body is in the same library level unit
as the call, otherwise use if if necessary to give permission for extra
dependencies.

/Bevin