From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ede2fcfbef7f3092 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "out" parameters Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:20:37 +0200 Organization: AdaCL Message-ID: <2368092.hEM5qJcVEZ@linux1.krischik.com> References: <874qqairji.fsf@insalien.org> Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1085214363 03 26822 v1c5G6erZ6NNDBo 040522 08:26:03 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: SPnCErZQQeEzIs6TCD8gDhP2SpUXsL9ntydU25r4Dw9JvWpWvtd1Qn User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:769 Date: 2004-05-22T10:20:37+02:00 List-Id: Keith Thompson wrote: > Ludovic Brenta writes: > [...] >> Besides by-copy and by-reference, there is also the possibility of >> passing parameters in processor registers. > > Isn't that just a special case of by-copy? Depends if a reference or a copy is passes within the register ;-). With Regards Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com