From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: generic with function procedure
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 01:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2020-06-10T01:45:23-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <235d0331-eb86-45cc-ad31-42dbf95923d7o@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a31389d-d554-46f5-930e-495192b1fbcbo@googlegroups.com>
Am Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2020 10:21:13 UTC+2 schrieb Gilbert Gosseyn:
> Apparently the problem is solved when I make the parameter list for f, g, and h the same. (it must be a well known fact when using more than one with. However, I missed it). Thanks to all contributors.
What do want to say with this? Of course the parameter and return profiles of generic parameter subprograms need not be the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-05 14:35 generic with function procedure Gilbert Gosseyn
2020-06-05 14:52 ` gautier_niouzes
2020-06-05 15:45 ` Gilbert Gosseyn
2020-06-05 15:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2020-06-05 16:09 ` Anh Vo
2020-06-05 20:28 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-06-09 16:44 ` Shark8
2020-06-10 8:21 ` Gilbert Gosseyn
2020-06-10 8:45 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2020-06-12 14:29 ` Shark8
2020-06-12 16:45 ` Simon Wright
2020-06-12 18:49 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox