From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!styx!nike!cad!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcjove!jonab
From: jonab@sdcjove.UUCP (Jonathan P. Biggar)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ForTran-Ada + flamette + question
Message-ID: <230@sdcjove.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Jun-86 12:28:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcjove.230
Posted: Mon Jun  2 12:28:52 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 4-Jun-86 07:46:02 EDT
References: <4700037@ada-uts> <503@noscvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: jonab@phoebe.UUCP (Jonathan P. Biggar)
Organization: SDC R+D Distributed Architectures, Camarillo, CA
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <503@noscvax.UUCP> broman@noscvax.UUCP (Vincent P. Broman) writes:
>A generic quadrature package mispleases because separate copies of
>it must be instantiated for each function to be integrated.

Please DON'T confuse Ada with its current implementations.  There is
no reason that the bodies of a generic quadrature package cannot be
shared.  Just because current implementations don't do it (YET!!!),
don't damn Ada.


Jonathan Biggar (sdcrdcf!jonab)