From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:4ddc:: with SMTP id
 t89-v6mr1783937jad.19.1536763333576;
        Wed, 12 Sep 2018 07:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5557:: with SMTP id j84-v6mr95415oib.3.1536763333444;
 Wed, 12 Sep 2018 07:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!x188-v6no340806ite.0!news-out.google.com!c63-v6ni609ith.0!nntp.google.com!x81-v6no342500ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 07:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5ce558e3-54ba-4cea-80d0-590cd6abfcde@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=73.205.150.94;
 posting-account=Ru7E4QoAAAC_HiQ2D8LjZ7rh1mbTNcVn
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.205.150.94
References: <7a6b1ae7-f142-458d-ab01-c36c8ed30659@googlegroups.com>
 <5ce558e3-54ba-4cea-80d0-590cd6abfcde@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <22acbd7a-f95f-463a-9312-bc3f3c8476f9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Error: "non-local pointer cannot point to a local object"
From: NiGHTS <nights@unku.us>
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:42:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54332
Date: 2018-09-12T07:42:13-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 2:05:08 AM UTC-4, rakusu...@fastmail.jp=
 wrote:
> For Access attribute compiler checks if the object itself will live as lo=
ng as an access to it for preventing "dangling reference". For situations w=
hen you take control over pointers in your hands, you must use the Unchecke=
d_Access attribute. See ARM95 13.10 for details.
>=20
> P.S.: Sorry for google translate.

Yes, I had forgotten about that attribute. That could also work for me. Tha=
nk you.