From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d918:: with SMTP id n24mr11215917iop.3.1546278699122;
        Mon, 31 Dec 2018 09:51:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c703:: with SMTP id x3mr466725oif.5.1546277498488;
 Mon, 31 Dec 2018 09:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q69no43089itb.0!news-out.google.com!v141ni80ita.0!nntp.google.com!q69no43088itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 09:31:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0e9253a0-b5ab-4f87-aa63-a9b2caa575d0@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <b3tlui$vl3$07$1@news.t-online.com>
 <73eb9d07-b3cf-4d3b-9802-eeb148a0c2e0@googlegroups.com>
 <0d16f930-33ce-4e62-bc63-4719199b4e02@googlegroups.com>
 <dabb58f2-594e-4e2b-82cb-e7b20178821b@googlegroups.com>
 <3d2749b5-dea5-47b3-9521-688f4f846e0d@googlegroups.com>
 <0e9253a0-b5ab-4f87-aa63-a9b2caa575d0@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2292f8b9-3223-4a06-bf2c-ccef73531940@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ANTLR grammar for Ada available
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 17:51:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55142
Date: 2018-12-31T09:31:38-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, 31 December 2018 17:05:18 UTC, oliverm...@gmail.com  wrote:

> I agree and would add that I actually prefer working with the less sophis=
ticated V2/V3 technology because it elicits weaknesses in the RM Annex P gr=
ammar which might go unnoticed using the more powerful V4 technology.
> See my posting "Ada grammar rules for names too permissive" [1].

The problem with the grammar in appendix P is that it's defined badly, i've=
 commented before that they couldn't even be bothered to place the pragma n=
on-terminals in the correct place, so you have to guess based on really ann=
oyingly worded paragraphs and hope they're right.