From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!ukma!rex!uflorida!winnie!zach!gsttallet From: gsttallet@zach.fit.edu (Joe Tallet) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: X Bindings and Implementations Message-ID: <2260@winnie.fit.edu> Date: 5 Apr 91 00:48:18 GMT Sender: usenet@winnie.fit.edu Reply-To: gsttallet@zach.UUCP (Joe Tallet) Organization: Florida Institute of Technology, ACS, Melbourne, FL List-Id: I'm in need of information concerning different X products. I am familiar with the following X products: o from Rational, an implementation of X written in Ada, o from MIT, Rational's Ada implementation of X, o from Verdix, Ada bindings to the C implementation of X, this is the STARS 'version', o from GHG, an Ada implementation of X, similiar to Rational's version? o from EVB, Ada bindings to MOTIF, o from TAE++, bindings or implementation? What I need to know is how are these products related, interface-wise? For example (and even specifically): Q: How close is Rational's Ada implemenion of X to the previous MIT Ada binding? How much success did they have in keeping the interfaces the same (type-wise and subroutine-wise)? Q: How close is Verdix's Ada binding to the previous MIT Ada binding? Q: How does Verdix's Ada binding and Rational's Ada implementation compare interface-wise. Q: How does GHG's Ada implementation of X compare with Rational's implementation (again - interface-wise)? Q: What are the Ada compilers supported by each of these Ada products? The reason that I am looking for this information is that I need to know what kinds of problems I will have in porting an application to these different X products. Problems in terms of interface differences and Ada compiler support issues. Please respond through e-mail to jot@sps.com or uunet to ...!uunet!sps!jot. I may not be able to review every response posted here. As for the information I will gather, I will post it once completed (unless there is opposition to this). Thanks in advance... jot