From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,131f06967722ab4b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 2005? Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:01:37 +0100 Organization: None Message-ID: <22079486.hMfpcNLlTu@linux1.krischik.com> References: <1103344064.372396.51420@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1n1v6175zrtcc.2g6ewdvu7ei5$.dlg@40tude.net> <1103568585.285484.237450@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <17804669.eaDZ45aH7Z@linux1.krischik.com> <1103643255.196052.267230@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1750748.eDONUVZfBc@linux1.krischik.com> <70chu8ZFjnzO@eisner.encompasserve.org> Reply-To: martin@krischik.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1103713452 02 8666 cPZZrQM6J+kqNO9 041222 11:04:12 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: V923G2ZeZedKSkTFaCcdSQo7xXJje72jpCoBhspVhyNj48lDN+OX4J User-Agent: KNode/0.8.0 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7152 Date: 2004-12-22T12:01:37+01:00 List-Id: Larry Kilgallen wrote: > In article <1750748.eDONUVZfBc@linux1.krischik.com>, Martin Krischik > writes: >> jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net wrote: >> >>> There are actually some other small differences between "struct" and >>> "class" in C++. >>> In a "struct" all members are public by default, while in a "class" all >>> members are private by default. >> >> But that is exactly what I said. >> >> For those who can't read regular expression >> >> is you replace "class X {" with "struct X { private :" then nothing >> changes. > > I was under the impression the discussions here were to be in English > or Ada, not in some other syntax from particular platforms. You are right. Where is the problem? With Regards Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com