From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c5f68ab74d5099ee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.212.232 with SMTP id nn8mr303712pbc.1.1324347612823;
        Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni42535pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interfaces.Shift_Left
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:18:45 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <21d7d399-3ca7-4b99-befc-7d8d8137ddf4@x7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <18214312-82f5-45c4-b20d-cb530b500929@h3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <jc7eof$1fe$1@dont-email.me>
 <5f989095-5c1c-4b23-a538-d70f4718b4b1@l19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <jc8h83$86p$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <a76daa61-49f7-4235-af65-11973a012f35@v29g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
 <jcb95d$j72$1@munin.nbi.dk> <9ktu5mFn31U1@mid.individual.net>
 <jce32s$brp$1@munin.nbi.dk> <9l71m2FlhuU1@mid.individual.net>
 <jcolev$o4n$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.230.151.194
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1324347612 27518 127.0.0.1 (20 Dec 2011 02:20:12
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.230.151.194;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2011-12-19T18:18:45-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Dec 19, 6:38=A0pm, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Anyway, let me repeat again: YMMV. Your application works for you, and
> that's fine. I just don't think that you should tell the world (most of
> whose applications are very different from yours) that record represenati=
on
> clauses don't work. Because they're in the top 5 reasons to use Ada, and
> without them, Ada becomes just another programming language (with better
> syntax, but good luck convincing anyone of that).
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Randy.

What are the other four?