From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Luke A. Guest Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Successor Language Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:57:26 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <217213441.549636947.114978.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> References: <5e86db65-84b9-4b5b-9aea-427a658b5ae7@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 7g1xAi69fD1aacr2pkK7Yw.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4Ort6XQcINf5hAMGzuxqFtpUlNU= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52852 Date: 2018-06-02T13:57:26+01:00 List-Id: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote: >> We should adopt the common C shorthand operators, -=, +=, etc. > What's the problem with @ ? It's more elegant and versatile. > The proposal is to use +:=, -:=, etc which is ok but a little weird. The other proposal is to use @ as the lhs shorthand.