From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!enea!sommar From: sommar@enea.se (Erland Sommarskog) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Object-Oriented DBMSs and Ada Applications Message-ID: <215@enea.se> Date: 26 Aug 89 08:04:46 GMT Organization: Enea Data AB, Sweden List-Id: Edward Berard (eberard@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu) writes: > At some point during development, you realize that your > software talks about object and classes, and your DBMS, being > relational, doesn't understand these things. Seems OK to me. Since Ada hardly can be said to be a object- oriented langauge it's 1-1. -- Erland Sommarskog - ENEA Data, Stockholm - sommar@enea.se The law of gravity should be forbidden execpt in downhills.