From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.36.28.77 with SMTP id c74mr5373987itc.55.1508745632789;
        Mon, 23 Oct 2017 01:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.94.7 with SMTP id d7mr445467oti.8.1508745632723; Mon, 23
 Oct 2017 01:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!k70no3967612itk.0!news-out.google.com!p6ni2626itp.0!nntp.google.com!l196no3959533itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 01:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2030952772.530431824.881357.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.163.1.105;
 posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.163.1.105
References: <498648ad-7a60-4847-b272-772383d197d0@googlegroups.com>
 <2908c15e-0359-460e-824d-f832da32d196@googlegroups.com>
 <2030952772.530431824.881357.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <210ced73-9d38-4963-b205-c18c2b46eb18@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poor performance after upgrate to xubuntu 17.10
From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:00:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3032156459
X-Received-Bytes: 1748
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48572
Date: 2017-10-23T01:00:32-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 8:11:25 AM UTC+2, Luke A. Guest wrote:
> Robert Eachus <rieachus@comcast.net> wrote:
> .
> > 
> > Finally, just good task programming.  If you expect to have each task on
> > its own CPU core or thread, use affinities to tie them to specific cores.  
> 
> How do you do this in Ada?


Aspect/pragma "CPU".

Regards,

Mark L