From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9d56:: with SMTP id g83mr16500810qke.38.1612784837774;
        Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:47:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:e016:: with SMTP id x22mr25638878ybg.92.1612784837554;
 Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer04.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 03:47:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d63a8bcf-aef0-43b1-9d2f-ae3d2b01f923n@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.240.219.181; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.219.181
References: <05ea3d57-6d03-4f8e-8a8c-6282a11f447dn@googlegroups.com> <d63a8bcf-aef0-43b1-9d2f-ae3d2b01f923n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <20f14d27-2278-4498-a591-15c46b82e272n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: qualified expression
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 11:47:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1969
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61318
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Terrible unreadable style!
My bad. But I so like qualified expression. and renames. and the more or le=
ss esoteric bits.
> T_type'(det1, Var2(1..det1+1)); -- positional, slides=20
I know I can do that but since T_arrays and T_vect are 1) different types 2=
) more importantly do not have the same range (one starts at 0 the other at=
 1) so I was, and still am, unsure if the indices would be shifted in the c=
onversion, or left as they are (1..det+1).
Without conversion, if these are just different array subtypes with differe=
nt indice rangs same problem.
I just don't know the rules regards to index range... surely it's somewhere=
 in the rm but good luck to me finding it.