From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,19924f2facf8443 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: amado.alves@gmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Larger matrices Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <20728980-ce79-4d1f-b2dc-352d3d381af4@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <40ed91c2-3dab-4994-9a7b-4032058f0671@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <6g08gqFdle1aU1@mid.individual.net> <4b10ef8d-5049-4519-b5ff-026d1387120c@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <6g0hn4Fdkv5oU2@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.214.84.23 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218126330 11360 127.0.0.1 (7 Aug 2008 16:25:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.214.84.23; posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1512 Date: 2008-08-07T09:25:29-07:00 List-Id: > I was able to raise the stack size using these methods, but maybe you're > hitting some other wall. Have you tried with some simple testcase to see if > you're getting a larger stack at all? I seem to remember that some linker > settings were failing silently for someone, until it got it right. Some other time maybe I will try that. Currently it is too risky. I am pressed. Thanks.