From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,15b0ab6fa90f819d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-09 16:47:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: snarflemike@yahoo.com (Mike Silva) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "Tracking the Blackout bug" Date: 9 Apr 2004 16:47:31 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <20619edc.0404091547.3a856dd8@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.8.35.213 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1081554451 19523 127.0.0.1 (9 Apr 2004 23:47:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 23:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6931 Date: 2004-04-09T16:47:31-07:00 List-Id: Peter Amey wrote in message news:... > sk wrote: > > Article at "The Register" about the electricity blackout > > in the Northeast (USA) last year. .... > The developers did NOT do everything they could. They could have used > the Ravenscar profile in Ada; they could use RavenSPARK; they could have > done some model checking of the concurrent parts of the program. They > did NOT test exhaustively because it is impossible (/exhaustingly/ I am > willing to believe). And software doesn't HAVE to be cr*p! I hope that you can learn enough of the details about the bug to write up something showing how current best practice (using current best language? :-) would have prevented the problem.