From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 14:45:48 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: snarflemike@yahoo.com (Mike Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title)
Date: 4 Jun 2003 14:45:47 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <20619edc.0306041345.74a1ff20@posting.google.com>
References: <mailman.8.1054540581.12990.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <slrnbdm1i7.1k5.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bbf9kl$7kt$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>
 <20619edc.0306021018.6ee4dd09@posting.google.com> <c5jhbb.0sd.ln@skymaster>
 <1054649187.11497@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <20619edc.0306031034.6a2f5f25@posting.google.com>
 <1054666439.685312@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <slrnbdrj6f.i5.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <1054735867.264510@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <biijN$2Wg7Lp@eisner.encompasserve.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.6.152.68
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1054763147 7342 127.0.0.1 (4 Jun 2003 21:45:47
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Jun 2003 21:45:47 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38645
Date: 2003-06-04T21:45:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:<biijN$2Wg7Lp@eisner.encompasserve.org>...
> In article <1054735867.264510@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> > Preben Randhol wrote:
> >> Of course there is reasons for it as have been itterated over and over.
> > 
> > People are certainly repeating reasons over and over,
> > nut I haven't seen any that hold water. The one that
> > seems to appear most often is that a word should mean
> > the same thing regardless of its case, because that
> > mimics natural language. That fails on two grounds,
> > first that in natural language, case does affect
> > meaning (eg., polish vs. Polish, Ada vs. ADA), and
> > second that in Ada, one word may be overloaded to
> > have several meanings.
> 
> Hyman, I think you win the prize for repeating over and over in this topic :-)

Or did you mean over and Over and ovEr and oVeR and... :-)