From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-02 14:24:18 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: snarflemike@yahoo.com (Mike Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title)
Date: 2 Jun 2003 14:24:17 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <20619edc.0306021324.6baa5f1f@posting.google.com>
References: <1054578576.281946@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <ZSMCa.812515$OV.748440@rwcrnsc54>
 <pan.2003.06.02.18.51.49.881243@mail.utexas.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.6.152.68
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1054589058 31688 127.0.0.1 (2 Jun 2003 21:24:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Jun 2003 21:24:18 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38404
Date: 2003-06-02T21:24:18+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.06.02.18.51.49.881243@mail.utexas.edu>...
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:40:57 +0000, tmora wrote:
> 
> > With the coming of handwriting recognition shouldn't case sensitivity
> > logically be extended to consider a letter "A" in lower case OEM font
> > different from not only "A" in upper case OEM font, but also different
> > from cursive script, Gothic, etc?  Just visualize what a program might
> > look like.
> > <gd&r>
> 
> Does the semantics of a program change when you print it with a different
> font...?
> 
> Inquiring minds want to know!

What about font size?  Should e.g. tasks written in larger font sizes
have higher priority?

I think we could leave the C-obfuscators in the dust with these new
developments!