From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!inmet!stt
From: stt@inmet.inmet.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Missing accept statement
Message-ID: <20600036@inmet>
Date: 16 Mar 90 16:52:00 GMT
References: <203521@<1990Mar15>
Nf-ID: #R:<1990Mar15:203521:inmet:20600036:000:302
Nf-From: inmet.inmet.com!stt    Mar 16 11:52:00 1990
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


It is legal to have a task with an entry
with no matching accept body.  It would be friendly for a compiler
to produce a warning for this situation when encountered,
but there is no language requirement to that effect.
Perhaps there should be...

S. Tucker Taft
Intermetrics, Inc.
Cambridge, MA  02138