From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!inmet!ryer
From: ryer@inmet.inmet.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada & IBM
Message-ID: <20600018@inmet>
Date: 17 Nov 89 15:16:00 GMT
References: <7056@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Nf-ID: #R:hubcap.clemson.edu:7056:inmet:20600018:000:520
Nf-From: inmet.inmet.com!ryer    Nov 17 10:16:00 1989
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Last I heard, Ada is not on the list of _acceptable_ languages for IBM's
SAA (Systems Application Architecture?) applications.  (SAA is IBM's big
new advance in portability and interoperability and a fundamental part
of their strategy for computing in the 90's).  If a program
is coded in Ada, it can't comply with SAA, regardless of any other
compatibility or interfaces.  Has this changed?  It is easy to write
a brochure, but where's the beef?

Mike Ryer
(personal comment, not endorsed by my employer, Intermetrics)