From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,595c75298fbdce96 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!postnews.google.com!j18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Cyrille Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is Aunit helpful? Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <20168051-b726-4a6a-9d75-cb1e0f58b0be@j18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> References: <8a1e58c0-2330-4475-8013-97df103dd85e@o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <82r5ids1o9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <20100805211820.52c18cb5.tero.koskinen@iki.fi> <8d166cfb-4850-42b6-ac25-d9ac00df7565@q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <82ocd5wukf.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <3957496a-af4b-45f5-87c9-327b22d19f08@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <82eie0vzyd.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <32dc1191-0a83-40ef-8bbc-a13a06f2167e@u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.99.106.125 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1282048676 25918 127.0.0.1 (17 Aug 2010 12:37:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.99.106.125; posting-account=bNhsVwoAAAB6XmNPWgYcbUm6npIwL2C4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13453 Date: 2010-08-17T05:37:56-07:00 List-Id: On Aug 17, 4:46=A0am, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > fail (and thus eliminate the overhead); other tools may be able to do eve= n a > better job. That is, well-written preconditions and postconditions can be > statically proved. (The Ada 2012 language won't require that, because its > beyond the state-of-the-art today to be able to decide which ones can be > proved and which ones cannot. But I hope that we can do better in the > future.) This is one of the goals of the Hi-Lite project! (http://www.open- do.org/projects/hi-lite/)