From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.180.188.75 with SMTP id fy11mr2530014wic.5.1375961830316;
 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g3no16864213wic.0!news-out.google.com!cc8ni18449wib.1!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJu?= Persson <bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: library/binding for sftp?
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:37:09 +0200
Message-ID: <20130808133709.09dfef98@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>
References: <85li4gmhrt.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <2wgl8bcmdsu0$.1rs1604fzwufv.dlg@40tude.net>
 <85vc3jfias.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <1gwg87tgm2bo7$.ae7440ka6kmc.dlg@40tude.net>
 <85bo59g6h7.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ul3xotcxb4wh$.1rfdfqdzhndf.dlg@40tude.net>
 <kttvbd$jp7$1@dont-email.me>
 <bccmiwywovsc.1gr3p41feupbk$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5987935c-dbce-4602-b0e6-2bb85513588b@googlegroups.com>
 <9oo34px7j5ko$.1j7bcnxwzgcxe.dlg@40tude.net>
 <ef5ac77e-14b7-4328-8b7f-0db73020cee5@googlegroups.com>
 <20130808111404.5fc6ce14@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>
 <1nfcrgjw8vkrb.1aukq12ys882l$.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net Y4jruMmplK2X0XEwLd/uWg3C/vrA6DWKk4yMpaoIQxphvYKJPi
Cancel-Lock: sha1:70apMLe0GmE4+1lcSTplfcNmRDg=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Original-Bytes: 2060
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182863
Date: 2013-08-08T13:37:09+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Firstly, there is no protection against targeted attack. Secondly,
> regarding spies, they aren't any good in programming. Obscuring is
> the best method against unfocused surveillance which works only with
> known protocols.

Four false statements in a row.

Dmitry isn't going to change his mind so I won't debate this with him
further, but to everybody else: Don't listen to Dmitry. He doesn't
understand basic information security and is giving dangerous advice.

Bj=C3=B6rn Persson