From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ADDR_WS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,682d1c4a13fb8d32 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!novso.com!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:27:38 -0500 From: Martyn Pike Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:27:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2011070620273884195-martynatemconukdotcom@news-europe.giganews.com> References: <2011070520341767939-martynatemconukdotcom@news-europe.giganews.com> <486fcdd0-f21d-401c-9bd5-670c7e6d96c0@g16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: DDS and Ada User-Agent: Unison/2.1.4 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-H31kHakDHZdhehbNCJECyy/uj5IR4cGCDpk9Jc349tyam2POBEr+0QR1h4zJeVstLdh+HdHnLVH4AzI!gk0h/NqxuOoFa81adm7y4f13luJ2kY0SkxJ0bk/XKQgismPWBOi9FZOu5JkfRMoDmMKRxqAjQRBL!6owEn6yvRjjezxDgr/sQKu3rL+zR X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2684 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20102 Date: 2011-07-06T20:27:38+01:00 List-Id: On 2011-07-05 21:59:54 +0100, Maciej Sobczak said: > On Jul 5, 9:34�pm, Martyn Pike wrote: > >> Hi. �Has anyone that frequencts this group ever successfully deployed >> an Ada based DDS systems ? �Either using a COTS or custom >> implementation. > > Do you insist on the exact DDS implementation or is your interest of > wider scope? > If you really need DDS, then I think RTI has an Ada binding to one of > their products. > Otherwise you might also want to have a look at this: > > http://www.inspirel.com/yami4/ > > This system can be used as a lightweight alternative to DDS, > especially with its flexible message broker that supports publish- > subscribe with hierarchic multiway message matching. As a side note, > this broker was actually implemented in Ada, which is unlike most > (all?) messaging products out there that merely offer a thin binding > or a client interface to something implemented in C or Java. > > In either case, don't hesitate to post your findings or conclusions > here, the subject of distributed systems is very much Ada-related. My interest is in the wider scope but specifically the interoperability of different solutions. I understand that different CORBA ORBs can talk to eachother but I am less convinced different DDS implementations can talk to eachother. So a C++ DDS publisher and an Ada DDS subscriber as per the spec is what I am looking for. Ada DDS implementations seem thin on the ground