From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b7d3a51d0d8b6ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.k-dsl.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!not-for-mail From: Stefan Bellon Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Extending discriminant types Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:33:06 +0100 Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG Message-ID: <20081126123306.62e905e5@cube.tz.axivion.com> References: <20081115101632.5f98c596@cube.tz.axivion.com> <492a7d07$0$30236$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <8e021577-260a-44e1-b765-4d81f6ba89df@33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <492be08b$0$32676$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <0xZWk.396391$TT4.276049@attbi_s22> <71304b75-71bc-4691-b511-69882bdc0fc3@a12g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <492c77a1$0$31347$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <2ebc6a98-ebd9-4bfb-b69a-c313e9a9090a@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <2T1Xk.451865$yE1.273979@attbi_s21> <20081126103846.3f9475ac@cube.tz.axivion.com> <163e7b10-8571-4320-ad80-39c522e474d3@j35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <20081126111646.6d064e36@cube.tz.axivion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de 1227699186 29082 129.69.226.26 (26 Nov 2008 11:33:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.uni-stuttgart.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:33:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-URL: http://www.axivion.com/ Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2807 Date: 2008-11-26T12:33:06+01:00 List-Id: On Wed, 26 Nov, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > On Nov 26, 11:16 am, Stefan Bellon > wrote: > > No, it is a good one. Especially because GNAT 3.15p seems to exhibit > > this bug as well. ;-) > > Yes indeed. His only escape could be to prove that GNAT 3.15p is in fact correct in accepting it because it is no bug at all. -- Stefan Bellon