From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a88e582de42cdc9b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!aotearoa.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.rediris.es!newsserver.news.garr.it!newsserver.cilea.it!docenti.ing.unipi.it!o2943499
From: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:55:16 +0100
Organization: CILEA
Message-ID: <20080306125053.R26227@docenti.ing.unipi.it>
References: <0_mdna0iHpIsCifaRVnzvQA@telenor.com>
 <47ba9867$0$21892$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
  <dN2dndl3zoW5Oifa4p2dnAA@telenor.com>
 <dbe54d78-5bd2-4ad0-ab93-f00b099ae5a3@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com>
  <spCdnTyCKpCfvSHaRVnzvQA@telenor.com>
 <3a281192-2744-4110-9fc1-90c155c9436b@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
  <qm_uj.42460$yE1.36921@attbi_s21>
 <48277611-402f-4622-be05-6edddf6dd56a@o10g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <0E3vj.42830$yE1.34790@attbi_s21> <yH3vj.42565$9j6.42446@attbi_s22>
Reply-To: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: docenti.ing.unipi.it
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: newsserver.cilea.it 1204804516 26703 131.114.28.20 (6 Mar 2008
 11:55:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@cilea.it
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Mar 2008 11:55:16 GMT
X-X-Sender: o2943499@docenti.ing.unipi.it
In-Reply-To: <yH3vj.42565$9j6.42446@attbi_s22>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20194
Date: 2008-03-06T11:55:16+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:                                                       |
|>                                                                               |
|> I think there's quite a bit of difference between having (almost) all programs|
|> deliberately fail to implement the Ada semantics, and having an unintentional |
|> error in a compiler. The latter is trying to implement Ada; the former isn't. |
|> With its default options, GNAT is much more like the former than the latter.  |
|                                                                                |
|More to the point, perhaps, is that it's interesting to see a posting here about|
|the latter, but the 1_000th posting asking why GNAT doesn't catch integer       |
|overflow isn't."                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

So which Ada compiler(s) for Linux does Singo Solution use?

Colin Paul Gloster, unemployed job applicant