From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6426898aedaa5880 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!feeder.erje.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-stu1.dfn.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!not-for-mail From: Stefan Bellon Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Pragma for conditional compilation? (Ada 2005 vs. 95) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:26:53 +0200 Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG Message-ID: <20070928222653.3f2826f7@cube.tz.axivion.com> References: <1190879769.361848.188220@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190929570.915553.284000@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <4p1jdf.ssa.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <1190993095.488093.244130@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1v8jdf.rc4.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <1191002053.9585.66.camel@kartoffel> <46FD45BA.5030205@obry.net> <20070928220239.66807172@cube.tz.axivion.com> <46FD60C0.604@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de 1191011167 11701 129.69.226.24 (28 Sep 2007 20:26:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.uni-stuttgart.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:26:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-URL: http://www.axivion.com/ Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2203 Date: 2007-09-28T22:26:53+02:00 List-Id: On Fri, 28 Sep, Pascal Obry wrote: > In your case I think that both units are visible from GPS. Right ? I have to admit that we do not use GPS that intensively (mainly for debugging on Windows). :-/ But we use the very cool project files to replace Makefiles and to easily do multi-language builds with Ada, C, and C++ using gprmake. Having just loaded the project file in question into GPS, yes, both files are visible there. > In my case only one is visible, the one explicitly named. The other is > not as double underscore is not a proper default naming convention. Ah, that's a neat trick. Thanks for the hint! -- Stefan Bellon