From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news-east.rr.com!news.rr.com!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!clgrps13.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Gordon Sande Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Message-ID: <2006053112545116807-gsande@worldnetattnet> References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <4e078qF1cb6frU1@individual.net> <4e0e21F1chamsU1@individual.net> <10qtgfusyium5.1fe6t8kirrzbf$.dlg@40tude.net> <4e0h2aF1ccvnqU1@individual.net> <1j8hpasemtm7n$.1l1wrnukz7ewf$.dlg@40tude.net> <19jsg3me3b3gs.4tdf0tefhxrr$.dlg@40tude.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications User-Agent: Unison/1.7.5 Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:54:29 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.89.210.20 X-Trace: clgrps13 1149090869 24.89.210.20 (Wed, 31 May 2006 09:54:29 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:54:29 MDT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4627 comp.lang.fortran:10560 Date: 2006-05-31T15:54:29+00:00 List-Id: On 2006-05-31 12:42:09 -0300, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" said: > On Wed, 31 May 2006 14:58:44 GMT, robin wrote: > >> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message >> news:1j8hpasemtm7n$.1l1wrnukz7ewf$.dlg@40tude.net... > >>> Ah, but an unforeseen error is a bug. One cannot be bug-tolerant, it is >>> self-contradictory, after all. >> >> A program can be bug-tolerant. > > Indeed. I know so many programs exceptionally tolerant to their bugs... They often produce wrong answers which keep their users happy. When (or if) they are corrected and produce different answers the users are sometime not so happy. :-(