From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,43b764a97e83c96
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.volia.net!news.germany.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sn-ams-06!sn-xt-ams-05!sn-post-ams-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Love <rblove@airmail.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Praxis High Integrity Systems got /.
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:12:07 -0000
Organization: <none>
Message-ID: <20060107121210453-0600@news.airmail.net>
User-Agent: Halime (MacOSX)/1.0rc2b
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1550583.AA7TYtsqqn@linux1.krischik.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2460
Date: 2006-01-07T18:12:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In <1550583.AA7TYtsqqn@linux1.krischik.com> Martin Krischik  wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I have no time to read it right now but I expect a nice flame war:
> 
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/06/006225
> 

A quick read shows Ada doesn't get much play in this discussion.  Praxis 
and its methods are mentioned but it quickly unravels into a discussion 
of funding, functional languages, etc.  Praxis' point of view is 
overcome by other people's experiences where formal methods aren't used.