From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,707ffbf6ec9d1855 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!nntp.abs.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Love Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SBIRS, Ada and Ignorance Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:26:28 -0000 Organization: Message-ID: <20051228202616693-0600@news.airmail.net> User-Agent: Halime (MacOSX)/1.0rc2b MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20051222102521644-0600@news.airmail.net> <20051222152554655-0600@news.airmail.net> <20051223110200413-0600@news.airmail.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2388 Date: 2005-12-29T02:26:28+00:00 List-Id: In Joseph Vlietstra wrote: > Some answers about the SBIRS program. > - The SBIRS program was plagued by poor initial systems engineering. That much I suspected. Thanks for your information. > Anyone claiming that Ada was the problem is either ignorant of the > circumstances or hoping to obscure the initial systems engineering > problems. I used Ignorance in my orginal thread title but I bet is is the latter reason, LM officials looking for an easy scapegoat. What goads me is the USAF bought it hook, line and sinker. > In fact, Ada's language features allowed us to get as > far as we have. Sing it, brother. Now, how do we get the word out, other than to our merry band?