From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a875d9649dde34e3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:15:23 -0500
From: David Botton <david@botton.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:15:22 -0400
Message-ID: <2004100609152216807%david@bottoncom>
References: <mailman.211.1097058780.390.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: GWindows and a future home for it
User-Agent: Unison/1.5.2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.176.74.83
X-Trace: 
 sv3-Z20MQP548PRjFvveM4l93EIXU3Vq2oHKR+YZPaJDW+PdIvCtv3x3RkH84f5QGCOlE9/PXWEtHK32C5D!DDVIEC5teoENSK0QSuXA55Ea7acafduHcnDs/Cch3tbrEgVkT7Rk6oISuD9QuQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.19
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4798
Date: 2004-10-06T09:15:22-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

No, GNAT Pro is distributed under exactly the same lic. as the public 
version, GPL and GMGPL.

There is a request to customers not to distribute the non-public 
versions, but that is it, not even a contractual obligation not to do 
so.

The advantages of the Pro version is ACT's support and the cutting 
edge. The public versions are usually the most tested and stable 
versions, would you want a lack of stability or bugs in the public eye.

David Botton


On 2004-10-06 06:13:35 -0400, Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> said:

> 
> (Nice trick to keep the thread on topic :-)
> 
> As far as I know GNAT Pro is distributed under a proprietary license. 
> So, irrelevant.