From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a99e8bfe5a45795c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-20 07:25:29 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!144.212.100.101!newsfeed.mathworks.com!blanket.mitre.org!news.mitre.org!emery
From: David Emery <emery@mitre.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Ada binding for "proc"?
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:20:36 -0500
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Message-ID: <200320011020368872%emery@mitre.org>
Reply-To: emery@davebert.mitre.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-166-193.mitre.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: top.mitre.org 985101646 20085 128.29.166.193 (20 Mar 2001 15:20:46
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.mitre.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Mar 2001 15:20:46 GMT
User-Agent: YA-NewsWatcher/5.0.0
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5898
Date: 2001-03-20T15:20:46+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Has anyone done an Ada binding to the information maintained in 
the "/proc" file system?  In particular, on Solaris there's
typedef struct psinfo and typedef struct pstatus.

I'm interested in an implementation for any OS and any Ada 
compiler.  I'd be particularly interested in hearing from anyone
who has looked at "proc" across Operating Systems (particularly 
Solaris, Linux and LynxOS.)

   thanks in advance       dave

-- 
---
David Emery, The MITRE Corporation    "The way to win wars is not to do
+1 703 883 7606v, +1 703 883 6143      PowerPoint for your country.  The
emery@mitre.org                        way to win is to make the other guy
                                       do PowerPoint for his country"