From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,10ae388f70a273ff,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-01 08:51:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!uninett.no!news.net.uni-c.dk!sunsite.dk!newsfeed1.uni2.dk!newsfeed101.telia.com!nf01.dk.telia.net!news-stob.telia.net!telia.net!217.209.241.173.MISMATCH!masternews.telia.net.!newsc.telia.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Holm Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: GNAT 3.3 vs 3.15 Message-ID: <20030401185038.2405d2ba.david@realityrift.com> X-Newsreader: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:51:05 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.208.105.88 X-Complaints-To: abuse@telia.com X-Trace: newsc.telia.net 1049215865 217.208.105.88 (Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:51:05 CEST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:51:05 CEST Organization: Telia Internet Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35867 Date: 2003-04-01T16:51:05+00:00 List-Id: This has surely been answered before but I didn't find a satisfactory answer to it on groups.google.com. What are the problems of using GNAT 3.3 over 3.15? What is new since 3.15? I've been using 3.3 for a while and run it through my test suites (some simple floating-point stuff) and so far have had nog problems. //David Holm