From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d5cbc012ac099061
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-20 03:50:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!portc.blue.aol.com.MISMATCH!portc03.blue.aol.com!audrey04.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
X-Admin: news@aol.com
From: rprice9979@aol.com (RPrice9979)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 20 May 2001 10:50:18 GMT
References: <z2CN6.660$ce.1111604@newsrump.sjc.telocity.net>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: Non-Stub In Inner Scope?
Message-ID: <20010520065018.25233.00000485@ng-ck1.aol.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7657
Date: 2001-05-20T10:50:18+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Another solution is to make procedure Put_Line a separate. In procedure
Put_Line make the declaration for Wont_Work just as written. 

This solution require 2 files instead of 1, but it does keep the abstraction
layer the same.

Ronald J. Price