From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,14f7200925acb579
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: No Go To's Forever! (I'm sorry I spoke...)
Date: 2000/03/23
Message-ID: <2000Mar23.085437.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 601304671
References: <8bbk21$oa8$1@neptunium.btinternet.com>
 <HKhC4.6117$ZT3.38832@news.pacbell.net>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 953819680 20377 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <HKhC4.6117$ZT3.38832@news.pacbell.net>, tmoran@bix.com writes:
>>I only asked a question... now I've got replies that fill up a whole screen!
>   In the absence of actual empirical evidence, everyone is free
> to have strongly held opinions. ;)

I am sure Tom did not mean to commit the group to avoiding discussion
where there _is_ empirical evidence.  :-)