From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a02ecdd4cb0f0996
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Pragma Inline and its Effects of Compilation Dependencies.
Date: 2000/03/22
Message-ID: <2000Mar22.130327.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 600946072
References: <8b64ul$jov$1@inputplus.demon.co.uk> <8b8gen$mko$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38D7CABA.A73F88C6@cadence.com> <38D7F4D8.1AE44625@maths.unine.ch>
 <8b94tg$9jt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <2000Mar22.085654.1@eisner>
 <8bat53$6qb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 953748211 19818 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8bat53$6qb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:

> I do not know for sure what the DEC Ada 83 approach to inlining
> is but it would surprise me if it did inlining at bind time.

I know the capabilities of the VMS Linker, and they do not include
anything elaborate enough to do inlining.